State Senator Says Red Light Cameras Should be Banned
Speaking at the United Republican Club of Fort Lee’s Monthly meeting Tuesday, State Sen. Michael Doherty discussed legislation he introduced “to outright ban” red light cameras in New Jersey.
The United Republican Club of Fort Lee (URCFL) hosted New Jersey State Sen. Michael Doherty (R-23) Tuesday at the Fort Lee VFW for an event the local GOP group called “Red Light Cameras—The Real Story.”
“We brought Sen. Doherty here because we thought that the public deserves to hear the other side of the red light camera debate throughout New Jersey,” said URCFL president David Cohen. “And this side is not a side that you’re going to hear across the street at Borough Hall.”
Cohen said the debate is centered on the question, “Do red light cameras save lives by reducing accidents or are they primarily a way for cities to raise money in an era of lagging tax revenues?”
Doherty said he introduced bipartisan legislation in the state Senate, S1952—in the state Assembly it’s A2996, which is co-sponsored by Assemblywoman Valerie Vainieri Huttle (D-37), as Doherty noted—“to outright ban the red light camera program” in the state. He said he also started an online petition, which has garnered about 5,000 signatures to date.
“Right now we’re in a pilot program,” Doherty said. “The pilot program started in 2009 and … is to expire in December of 2014.”
He added that in order for the program to continue beyond that time, the state Legislature would have to take “affirmative action.”
“The reason I introduced the legislation is I think it’s important that the residents know where their elected officials stand on these important issues,” Doherty said. “And I felt that we put a stake in the ground that I think this program should be killed.”
Doherty said the best and most efficient way to improve safety is to increase the length of yellow lights, which is in part what legislation he plans to introduce would do.
He said that by his estimation, 80 percent of the tickets issued from red light camera programs are issued to motorists making legal right turns on red because they either don’t stop long enough or they stop with their wheels on the white line.
Estimating that the chances of someone getting into an accident while turning right on red are about one in 435,00, Doherty also said, “You may reduce one accident out of 435,000 turns, possibly, and for that, they’re terrorizing the residents of the state of New Jersey by issuing these $85 tickets.”
Therefore, he added, “Instead of being $85, we’re going to introduce legislation that it would be $20” for such a violation.
Doherty called the use of red light cameras a form of intimidation on the part of the government and said, “They’re using our citizens as cash cows,” and that “there is no due process.”
“Many times if a police officer stops you, you’re able to discuss with the officer and explain extenuating circumstances,” he said. “And the officer can use their judgment.”
Fort Lee Mayor Mark Sokolich has said the possibility of a red light camera enforcement program for the borough is something the Mayor and Council are likely to move forward on.
“I’m not going to deviate from the course,” Sokolich said, insisting that such an enforcement program isn’t designed “to ticket my own community.”
He said it’s intended to make dangerous intersections safer and to generate revenue for the borough, much of which he said would come from non-residents “who are just using [Fort Lee] as a cut-through.”
In June, Police Chief Thomas Ripoli also briefly addressed the issue when he was a guest speaker at a URCFL meeting, saying there are “negatives and positives” to red light camera enforcement programs, but that he would defer to the governing body on whether such a program makes sense for Fort Lee.
Martha Cohen, who made red light cameras one of the major issues of her unsuccessful campaign for Borough Council last year and has done a lot of research on the issue, said Tuesday that Fort Lee is “on the precipice of a vote on this issue.”
“As usual, the Mayor and Council keeps the exact details a secret, and all we hear is that it is a revenue grand slam, and that it will make our lives safer,” she said. “The facts are completely different.”
Several people brought tickets they had been issued for red light camera violations to the meeting, but URCLF vice president Keith Jensen said the group did not want to make the meeting “a venue to air their sadness,” calling it instead an opportunity “to learn and then take back to their respective communities to tell their friends and Mayor and Council.”
Among the Democrats and Republicans who turned up for the well-attended meeting Tuesday were Ridgefield Councilman Warren Vincentz, Ridgewood Councilwoman Bernadette Walsh and Englewood Cliffs resident Mary O’Shea, who said she was ticketed for a right turn on a red light near the Assembly Steak House at Sylvan Avenue and East Palisade Avenue.
Follow Patch on Facebook and Twitter or subscribe to our free daily newsletter
Brian Ceccarelli
12:57 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
Perspective on Red Light Camera Fraud
http://redlightrobber.com/red/links_pdf/fraud-chart.pdf
Tee Smyth
2:06 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
"Many times if a police officer stops you, you’re able to discuss with the officer and explain extenuating circumstances" I honestly chuckled.
Jim
3:37 pm on Wednesday, August 22, 2012
A lot of the real dangerous running - many seconds into the red - occurs because the intersection (and the signal) isn't prominent enough - the motorist (a visitor) may miss seeing it, entirely, or he may think it's not a major intersection. Here's how to make an intersection (and signal) more prominent. Cheaply and quickly.
A. Paint "signal ahead" on the pavement. A study sponsored by Florida's DOT found that doing so could cut running by up to 74%.
B. Make the signal lights bigger in diameter or, add another signal head. A study by the Texas Transportation Institute (TTI) found that doing either one could cut crashes by 47%.
C. Add backboards to the signal heads, or enlarge those you have. The TTI study found that doing so could cut crashes by 32%.
D. For nighttime driving, install brighter bulbs in the street lights and put up lighted name signs for the cross street.
These things should be tried at the city's ten worst intersections, and the results published, before there is any consideration of putting in red light cameras.
Hank
11:51 am on Thursday, August 23, 2012
and a "countdown" showing how long you have for a green
dara brown
9:06 am on Thursday, August 23, 2012
Red light cameras are just an easy revenue raising ploy. They should be banned/
thetentman
3:23 pm on Thursday, August 23, 2012
Wow, I watch people run lights in Ridgewood all the time. Now when a light turns green I wait 3 seconds before proceeding. I get honked at a lot but I am not dead. I would rather have red light cameras than State Senators anyday. Talk about a money grab.
DMAB6395
3:17 am on Saturday, August 25, 2012
I agree with you. I don't see anything wrong with having the red light camera. If you are going to fight the ticket then you go to court, just like you would when a cop writes out the ticket. Everyone cries about your privacy-with the way people are getting hit in the crosswalks because of people running the red light I am behind this red light camera & if you had a relative or knew someone that was hit because someone running the red light then you would agree too! If they put this on the ballot I would vote for it.
dn
4:23 pm on Thursday, August 23, 2012
Make it a statewide ballot question. I bet the cameras will be banned.
Diane Schwarz
6:05 pm on Thursday, August 23, 2012
Aren't we ALLOWED to make a R turn on red, except where marked?
DMAB6395
3:18 am on Saturday, August 25, 2012
Diane-other states have them & they also have the turn on red. I'm sure there's a way for them to put that information in the camera maybe with a sensor that already tells the light to change to green.
Ridgewooder
11:01 pm on Thursday, August 23, 2012
I think the cameras should be banned. FOREVER.
bb
1:49 am on Saturday, August 25, 2012
Diverse selection http://www.yessoso.com, its luxurious style and perfect design.They are one of the most popular brands in the world.
Larry glass
9:19 am on Saturday, August 25, 2012
I believe that the cameras cross the line when it comes to privacy. Almost like"big brother is watching you". I would support those politicians who support a ban on the red light cameras.
thetentman
9:32 am on Saturday, August 25, 2012
saw 2 people run reds yesterday. Add more cameras - grab all the money you can from the cretins who refuse to obey traffic laws. And I was stopped at a red light and got hit from behind. The doofus tried to tell the cop it was my fault for stopping to fast at a red light. The cop told him to shut up brfore he made it worse for himself. I almod=st got hit 2 days ago because I stopprd for a pedestrian in a crosswallk. Make them pay and perhaps they will pay attention.
Andy Schmidt
4:47 pm on Thursday, August 30, 2012
Hear, hear!
thetentman
9:35 am on Saturday, August 25, 2012
and just how does a red light camera interfere with a constitutional right of privacy? There can be no expectation of privacy on a public thoroughfare. NONE. It's public.
Jules Vernon
9:35 am on Wednesday, October 3, 2012
There aren't enough police around to enforce our existing traffic laws so we need MORE cameras. We should blanket intersections with cameras to catch:
1. those who go through red lights
2. those who roll through stop signs without coming to complete stop
3. those who refuse to stop for pedestrians at crosswalks
4. those who speed in residential neighborhoods
5. those who fail to signal turns or lane changes
These should also be applied to bicycle riders wherever appropriate