patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Kyleigh's Law Cut Crashes by 9%, Study Says

Researchers claim 1,624 crashes prevented as a result of Graduated License Program in first year.

 

After its first full year as a New Jersey law, the graduated driver’s license program has yielded a 9-percent drop in police-reported crash rates, according to a recent study published by the American Journal of Preventative Medicine.

The Graduated Driver’s License program, also known as Kyleigh’s Law, named for Long Valley teen Kyleigh D’allesio who, along with peer Tanner Birch was killed in a car crash in 2006 in Washington Township, was signed into law May 1, 2010.

Along with the 9-percent decrease in police-reported crashes among drivers under 21 years of age, the study shows there was a 14-percent increase in the citation rate from May 2010 to May 2011–the one-year time frame analyzed by a group of researchers from the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.

Kyleigh’s Law requires young drivers to affix decals on their license plates. The legislation also enforces the amount of passengers allowed in a vehicle at one time and imposes curfews on probationary motorists.

The study states an “estimated 1,624 young probationary drivers for whom a crash was prevented” as a result of the law.

Researchers concluded that “the law is positively affecting probationary drivers’ safety.”

To read the full report, go here.

For related Patch coverage on the topic, see:

Kyleigh's Law Decals Not a Violation, Court Rules

NJ Appeals Court Upholds Kyleigh's Law

  • Is Kyleigh's Law making a difference among young drivers?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes. The study exhibits why this was a good idea in the first place.
        14 (29%)
    • No. The study is an aberration and the law isn't necessary.
        33 (70%)
    Total votes: 47
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Graduated Driver's License and Kyleigh's Law

Ktown

12:51 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

I agree with a portion of this law. I like the curfew and the amount of passengers that are set for these young drivers but I do not like the stickers that are attached to the license plates. I feel they are targets for cops and criminals. If I had daughters I would not put these stickers on the car. I would tell her I would pay for the ticket of not having the stickers attached.

Reply
Comment_arrow

HCongSpiderman

1:15 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

So how many teens have been "targeted" by criminals because of the sticker?
Now, how many teens have been targeted at malls and playgrounds and walking home from school?
I doubt a criminal is going to go through the trouble of following a car with a sticker on when they can just go to the mall or wait near a school.

Comment_arrow

RdgwdGRock

2:13 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Ktown - let's see, cars have windows...right? If a criminal is intent on targeting a young driver, all the have to do is look and see. A sticker will not enable/deter the sick minded.

Comment_arrow

Elizabeth Cox

9:35 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

i totally agree. it is a target for young drivers.

Comment_arrow

Denobin

8:57 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

@Rdgwdgrock: If it is so easy for them to see in the windows, then why don't the police need the sticker? Do they somehow have worse eyesight? If you read the study, it gives a one paragraph short-shrift to the issue of predators. If compliance due to fear is so low, then give this issue the proper attention an put it to rest one way or the other. Until then, this is simply a feel-good law that makes kids a target for predators and overzealous law enforcement.

clyde donovan

1:56 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

I would raise the driving age to 21. That would be a better way of reducing the number of accidents by people 21 and under.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris

2:34 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

I think we just need to have more stringent road testing. And then retest every few years. I know more people other than just young people who could use a refresher.

Comment_arrow

FourScore

4:18 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Dumb idea! What about 17-20 year olds who need to drive to get to college, or work??? Imagine the affect on the economy if that pool of part-time minimum-wage workers that retailers relied on were no longer available because they couldn’t get to their job. Don’t punish all teens for the irresponsible behavior of a few. We adults wouldn’t appreciate it if that happened to us!

Comment_arrow

wally

12:57 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Really 21? c'mon, drinking age has already been raised, as has the age for cigarettes, while good for health reasons it sends a mixed message. You're called an adult at 18 and can serve your country, but for smoking and drinking your labeled a child. How did we all grow up without all these laws? Difference with today's children is they have no family structure or discipline.

Comment_arrow

wally

1:01 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

+ this is just a way for the state to make $$

Nose Wayne

2:11 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Like to NOSE how researchers did the study, "estimates" ? American Journal of Preventive Medicine ? Doesn't say how much money was spent, they must have forgot and left that part out.Let's put more police out there, that will bring the numbers down without a study to be done. STOP CUTTING BACK !!!!!

Reply

News Man

2:14 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

A Red Tot on a license plate.. reduces accidents?...How was that statistic arrived at?
What are the reviews by Insurance Companies... how do they see it?

How about improved driving lessons by the car's owner?

Reply

Steve

2:17 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Chris, that is absurd and in my opinion would only make the problem worse. First of all, the more practice a young driver has with a responsible adult driver when they have their permit is the key to instilling good driving skills. When I had my permit at 16, I drove every time we went somewhere weather it was 1 mile to Kings or on a longer trip. I had friends who got their permit, but the parents wouldn't let them drive at all. Then they got their license with having very little practice, and guess what happened? They got into accidents.

People need to take responsibility for themselves. I know quite a few NEW drivers that are better than some people who have had their license for years. Stop picking on teenagers. Everyone plays a part in this.

As for the sticker, I doubt it helps much. What we need is something to keep repeat drunk drivers off the road and a way to get people not to talk/text while driving.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris

2:43 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

I think you hit bulls eye with this one. Go figure.. parents should teach their kids how to drive. What a concept!!! My dad taught me how to drive WELL before the law allowed me to. When the time came for me to take my 6 hours/road test, I already knew how to parallel park, do a k-turn all that stuff.

Plus, I knew the other stuff they don't teach you... Like to turn the radio down, slow down, and pay attention to the cars around me. That's stuff that is NOT on the road test, but is MUCH more important than knowing how to do a k-turn.

USA1

2:27 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

silly and I would never let my child drive a car with a red bullseye on the car for any crazies out there!

Reply

Bob

2:44 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

That's great that the crash percentage has reduced , but I don't understand what a red sticker on the plate has to do with it , the sticker doesn't really play a role in how the car is operated

Reply
Comment_arrow

hrhppg

8:56 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

It gives other drivers like myself the heads up that the driver is new on the road - same concept as putting student driver on cars. Are you against student driver signs too. They are as big a bulleye for criminals, perverts or whatever group you want to pretend are going to abuse this law to harm your children.

Elizabeth Nolet

2:49 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Can't buy the statistics since so many teens do not use the red sticker, with their parents' permission.

Reply

Apple Tree Child Development Center Preschool

3:31 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

I agree, I dont think its the sticker, but the law in general is working ! as least it appears that way based on the study.

Reply

T Zinger

4:18 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

So when officers go to accidents, they now have to report whether there was a red dot on the license plate?? If not, then I too wonder... how DID they gather their data?

Reply

David Frazer

4:45 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

I haven't read the study but I'd say it's bunk. Almost certainly the decrease in accidents is due to a DECREASE IN DRIVING. The new law further restricted nighttime driving by impose an 11 p.m. instead of 12 a.m. curfew. It also restricted the number and type of passengers. In my household at least, the passenger restrictions has substantially curtailed driving by my 17 year old. Once my oldest daughter got her license, she became a de facto taxi service of her younger siblings and friends. These was not drunken, wild-eyed late night adventures, but mid-day trips to pick up her brother from a friend's house or her sister from softball practice. I assume this is true of other households as well. All of those trips are now literally against the law.

So, teens are driving less and, as a result, they get into fewer accidents. This is news?

What needs to be discussed about this law is how it reduces the opportunities for young drivers to practice driving. Those trips ferrying her siblings' around were invaluable to my older daughter and are now lost to my younger kids. As a result, they are going to be more inexperienced drivers when they finally age out of the red stickers. Maybe the tradeoff between less experience and more maturity is worth it, but I'm not sure.

That is something worthy of study.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kay

7:50 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

I totally agree. What is the correlation between a sticker and crash stats? Is is supposed to be a deterrent for the new driver, fear of being spotted by a cop with more than one passenger? What about all the new drivers who are over age? Like, the 25 year old who finally decides to get a license? Theoretically they could take the written exam, wait 3 months, take the test (claiming they've had practice with a licensed driver), pass the obstacle course test in the DMV parking lot, then proceed to demonstrate poor driving skills on our roads. Shouldn't they have a sticker too??

barry_geltzeiler

4:44 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

most teens i know do not use the sticker, at the school parking lot all of the stickers were taken off the cars by kids playing a joke. This is age discrimination. Why dont we have silver stickers on the plates of the seniors so we can stop them and give them an eye test or test their reaction time. i do not let my daughter put it on her car, it makes her a target. Its a shame Kaleigh died, but it was not because of the sticker law it was because wrecklessness. Find a way to end that and theres your solution.

Reply

Kristen

5:08 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

The bottom line is it's the law. Your 17 year old violating this law can in fact have their license suspended. As for the red sticker... How many of us have seen a mom or dad driving in a car with this displayed on the plate? I have seen many! One of the main reasons for having this is to alert the police that there may be a probationary driver behind the wheel. A probationary driver is allowed one non family member in the car. We've all heard the stories of 4 or 5 teens being killed or seriously injured because they were piled in a friends car. I have 2 daughters who both have these on their plates. What are we as parents teaching them by saying, "I will pay the ticket?"

Reply
Comment_arrow

FourScore

6:33 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

I drive with the stickers on my car all the time. I'm teaching my 16 year old to drive, and I'll be darned if I'm going to put the stickers on and take them off every time we switch drivers. That's why the law makes no sense.... the presence of the stickers is no guarantee that there's a provisional driver behind the wheel. It's nothing but a money maker for the DMV.

Comment_arrow

Chris

7:08 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

I actually haven't seen ANY of these red stickers around. Granted, I am not ever around young people.

But, just because it is the law doesn't mean it's right. I mean, come on. Look at the people making the laws.

Comment_arrow

barry_geltzeiler

9:49 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

I am teaching my children not to be a target for pedophiles or criminals looking to take advantage of kids. Secondly I am teaching them that profiling of any sort is wrong and bad.

Kevin C

5:46 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

The sticker is a good idea. However, can we please apply it to the license plates of those drivers who have been convicted of a DUI? After their licenses are no longer suspended, in order to be reinstated, a bright orange sticker is applied to their license plates.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chris

8:00 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Somebody would prob say that its cruel and unusual punishment. Like making an adulterer wear a Scarlet A. It's an illegal form of punishment.

This, on the other hand, is totally different. Its not a punishment, its for safety. Ha.

Susie

9:11 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Or how about handing out blue stickers for those who have been convicted of driving 80 in a 65 let's say. Where do u draw the line. My sympathies go out to kayleighs family but the law changed when my eldest began to drive and he couldn't help me picking his two siblings up from school on the days I had to work late. There needs to be adjustments to the law.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Denobin

9:27 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

That is a gross generalization. I could make one as well and say that seniors are not good drivers. Lets call for gold stickers on all senior citizens cars so that police can surreptitiously pull them over and car jackets know who the easy targets are. No? Why not?

Comment_arrow

RidgewoodResident

10:48 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Stickers for DUI convicts? Senior citizens?

Brett Kaiser

10:40 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

There are no red stickers. And if you don't think a Police Officer can tell they are breaking the law, then your are foolish. What does that leave? They have laws. Enforce them. Let me ask this. You get a young looking 20 something driving with a bunch of people...does the cop know to stop or not stop them? What happens when they do? uh/..uhh.uuh...no..it's here's a ticket for.....a licence plate ad from the dealer....yes I have that one cut out...it's bs...

Reply

Brett Kaiser

10:42 pm on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

From the "article". Not sureif it's quoyted from a source or the author.

>> Kyleigh’s Law requires young drivers to affix decals on their license plates.

Well It's MY Licences plate. So there you go.

Reply

Brian Hurrel

8:32 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Regardless, I will not put one of these stickers on my child's car. Sue me.

Reply
Comment_arrow

RdgwdGRock

10:03 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Brian - you are a dope. If your "child" is hurt or dies in an accident, then what?

Comment_arrow

FourScore

10:10 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

How exactly does a sticker prevent an accident???

Comment_arrow

barry_geltzeiler

11:01 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

because some wreckless kids got into an accident, a group of good responsible kids cannot go to a ball game or out to lunch in one car together?? this is nuts. Educate the kids, a sticker doesnt slow anyone down nor does it stop the wreckless driving.
My kid does not have the sticker and has been pulled over and nothing has been mentioned about the sticker. The police do not care about this law.

Comment_arrow

12345678

12:18 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

I feel the same way Brian. I would also fight the ticket.

LadyWillpower

10:26 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Hookerman: It notifies other drivers that this car is driven by a novice so, hopefully, the more experienced drivers will make allowances -- not tailgate, cut off the novice, etc., as New Jersey drivers are wont to do. The practice has worked successfully in Europe (with "L" plates or 90 [km] both front and back of a car) for decades -- why is it such a big deal to extend courtesies to beginner drivers?

Reply
Comment_arrow

FourScore

11:28 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Because, as mentioned several times on this thread, the presence of a red sticker on the car doesn’t mean diddly. I’ve seen more drivers who are my age with stickers on their cars than drivers who are teenagers. That’s because as soon as there’s a provisional driver in the family, every car the family uses gets a sticker, and they’re not removed until the provisional driver is no longer provisional. The stickers are a NJ state moneymaker… nothing more!

Comment_arrow

A. Gideon

2:09 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Further to this: I don't note the state from which a license plate is issued. From many angles, it isn't visible.

We've an analog in aviation, where a pilot appends to a radio call "student pilot". That's "visible". And the idea itself isn't bad. But a dot on a license plate? I don't see this as being particularly helpful.

...Andrew

Pam

10:56 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

I agree with LadyWillpower. I had teenage drivers both of whom were girls; I actually felt safer knowing they had the red stickers. New drivers don’t have the experience driving in traffic and avoiding accidents as do more experienced drivers. I know when I see a car with a red sticker I give it extra room to allow for the driver’s lack of experience and slower reaction time. My daughters were never stopped nor were they targeted by criminals

Reply
Comment_arrow

12345678

12:20 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

I see so few red stickers that I don't even look for them while driving. I'm more concerned with how the person is actually driving than whether or not they have a sticker. Everyone needs to drive defensively these days. I see parents on the phone and texting more than their kids.

barry_geltzeiler

10:57 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Woman drivers need pink stickers too, jews should have blue and white, communists get the red, how far should we go???? Democrats get donkey stickers and republicans get elephants??? Its called profiling, cops get in trouble for this, but our kids get singled out. Its unconstitutional.

Reply

Brett Kaiser

11:04 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

>> RdgwdGRock Brian - you are a dope. If your "child" is hurt or dies in an accident, then what?

Idiot

LadyWillpower Hookerman: It notifies other drivers that this car is driven by a novice so, hopefully, the more experienced drivers will make allowances -- not tailgate, cut off the novice

Oh Yeah? Guess you don't drive around here. Clueless

Pam I agree with LadyWillpower. I know when I see a car with a red sticker I give it extra room to allow for the driver’s lack of experience and slower reaction time.

WHAT? So you are NOT a courteous driver all the other times??? Holy Cow.

Reply

Pam

11:22 am on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Since I've never been in or caused an accident I think I could be called a courteous driver, I don't tailgate, flash my lights or cut off others. I follow the driving laws of NJ, however I give EXTRA allowances to new drivers. I also taught my young drivers to follow the rules of the road and recognize other new drivers but everyone doesn't.

As a parent, I would hate for ANYONE's child to be hurt or killed. I'm for anything that that COULD POSSIBLY prevent that.

Reply

EH

12:00 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

GDL has been around since at least 2006 when my son started driving.

Reply

Pam

12:04 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

It's the red sticker that goes on the plate that's new. It started spring 2010.

Reply

RdgwdGRock

12:27 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

the laws are there to protect everyone. the accident & death stat's regarding teen and young adult drivers are horrifying. if parents would be parents and enforce the driving regulations for their children, then there would be no need for these add'l laws.

Reply

12345678

12:42 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

RdgwdGRock, the problem is the majority of parents do enforce the driving regulations for their children and accept responsibility when they do something wrong....

Reply

Armando

12:58 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

I don't think anybody pays any attention to decals on the license plate besides for the police. What better way is there to discriminate based on age? What better way to notify predators when its dark that you're a 17 year old driver, driving alone?

Reply

Andrew

1:03 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

I'm 22 and I don't understand Kyleigh's Law. She chose to get in the car with that individual who was drunk apparently according to what I read years ago. I feel bad for her family of course because losing a child must make any parent lose their mind. However, because Kyleigh made that choice it shouldn't be put on young drivers. If anything parents need to step up. When I was 17 I never had an accident, drove drunk, got a ticket etc. I still have a clean record today. Sorry, but Kyleigh's Law is total garbage. It's basically saying if you die getting in the car with a drunk driver which she did you get a law named after you when you chose to do that. Unreal.

Reply

Jim dary

11:20 pm on Thursday, October 25, 2012

Srew that sticker i never used it o wait just to pass dmv test then took it of i was like a fresh donut and hot coffe on wheels cops were always tailing me

Reply

Leave a comment